neyronrose (neyronrose) wrote,
neyronrose
neyronrose

what turned into a rant on labels

I had added several paragraphs to Monday's entry, then lost it all when I tried to save it.  I reconstructed some, and am now attempting to reconstruct the rest.

I was thinking of how much Uly loved Family Unit, so much so that he thought it should be made into a movie.  Then I thought about how several AE members who post on the m/m romance forum were really jazzed about The Salisbury Key, and that's where the rant started.

I liked The Salisbury Key when it seemed like it was a contemporary, but then it got really woo-woo out there with conspiracies, the science, and archeological things towards the end.  It just got all too much for me.  I like what looks like a contemporary to stay a contemporary, and not turn into a big suspense-thriller with things going on that could have world-changing effects.  If I wanted possibly world-changing happenings and far-ranging conspiracies in a book, I would read those suspense-thrillers.  So that's where I think the labeling on that one was wrong for me, and the reviews I saw didn't go into how out there it all got at the end.  I'm fine with alternate universe if I know it's alternate universe.  I just need to know that.

(Added: I looked it up, and the tag line for The Salisbury Key is: "Can love repair a shattered life in time to save the world?"  So there is a bit about saving the world.  And I do blow past tag lines that are rhetorical questions.  It's dumb because you know the answer is yes if it's a question about a romance working out when the book is in the romance genre.  I didn't parse out the tag line, it's true.)

It's not just one author.  There have been a few others I've been upset with when it was a contemporary, and then suddenly the antagonists tried to kill one or both of the heroes.  One of those was labeled a romantic comedy.  Trying to kill someone takes it out of romantic comedy, in my opinion.  If I expect there will be violence in a book, I'm generally okay with it.  For instance, in Fighting in France, in the Big War series, I pretty much took the trench warfare and charges over the top in stride.  I knew there would be a lot of death, and that conditions were horrible.  I was prepared for reading it.  Yes, it was fiction, but based on real-life events.

I want my light and fluffy romances to stay light and fluffy, and I expect a contemporary romance to stay modest in scope.  Not that things can't happen, just not world-changing suspense-thriller things, or sudden veers into the paranormal, or villains going from mild villainy to trying to kill the protagonists.  It's about the labeling and what to expect.






Tags: books, ranting
Subscribe

  • Wednesday so far

    I went to bed at 1:00 a.m. and woke at 10:20 a.m. I read The Mechanical Chrysanthemums. A few hours later: Mom and I went to get spring water. We…

  • Monday so far

    I conked out around 1:00 a.m. and got up a little before 10:00 a.m. The Big Gay Fiction Giveaway is back.…

  • Sunday

    I conked out at 10:00 p.m. and woke at 10:00 a.m. I reread some more of the Whybourne and Griffin books. I texted with J., WhiteSheepCBD and A.…

  • Post a new comment

    Error

    Anonymous comments are disabled in this journal

    default userpic

    Your IP address will be recorded 

  • 0 comments